contraction religiosity and science? It uses still believe? The question of the supernatural (God, gods ,...) is probably as old as humanity itself
Just as there were believers, there were always skeptics, I would like you not bring to faith, but only to explain that this is the provability very difficult or impossible acts.
The nature of faith, goes back thousands of years, the oldest cave paintings that are 70,000 years old indicate religiosity and developed in Botswana.
But these are not the oldest evidence of religions, cults, there were skulls even earlier, there are grave goods were found in graves of the older than 100,000 years. So it seems
so that Religösität have long played a role in human life must be.
We observed an evolution of the faith, because the message and content from time to time difference and developed.
The brain functions, however, are in transcendent feelings from everyone equally, so it makes no difference whether the subject: Muslim, Christian, Jew, etc.. The areas are used by all persons equally, so we can make the statement that Religösität is a biological feature that everyone has. Only the contents of faith, we define itself subjectively
I would like to explain more precisely why Religiousness is something natural, neurologists have found that patients who were once very religious, following surgery to the brain suddenly kept less transcendent abilities. This suggests Soch strongly suggests that it is not illusory, the property is taken memetic, but is firmly anchored in the brain.
Furthermore, it was found that religiosity is heritable similar musicality to 50%.
The contents of religions is very similar and people should always be relevant. Then we ask
why so many people believe different things, why is there: naturalists, atheists, agnostics, theists, ... Because it
necessary, this balance is important so that none of the fractions alone ruled the world. For I would not want to be ruled by one of the two extreme parties. It is important to think rationally and it is important to the spirit to do something good.
Every thought is subjective, a purely objective view is impossible, because there are our borders, we always respect our position and neglect issues again and again and adjust to everything. I am happy to recommend the books on this subject: The blind spot and pitfalls of Ulrich Frey.
They explain clearly the basis of evolution, why we commit mistakes and think this makes sense for us and there were maybe still are. Our brains are built short circuit plans to use to save energy, caused prejudice and misconception.
it is important to make his cognitive abilities are in question, because only through continuous observation, it is possible, perhaps at the next meeting to learn from each other and to be cooperative. Does make sense in the light of evolution is not it? ;-) Greetings
literature: God and the genes - by Michael Blume and Vaas,
The God remembered - from Newberg